A Phenomenology of the Clipboard

I’ve noticed: When I have an image or sentence or URL copied (or cut) to the clipboard, but not yet pasted into its destination, my left hand—with which I always perform my pasting operations—feels, somehow, different.

I struggle to describe the sensation, but my hand and wrist feel a little higher in my brain’s list of sensory priorities, like there’s an urgency attached to the nerves there. The phenomenon, albeit subtle, has nonetheless proved effective as a safeguard against the accidental overwriting of clipped items with new copy operations.

The effect is heightened with increases in a clip’s “importance,” a flexible term in this case. Usually, “importance” maps onto one of two factors, or a combination of them:

  • a lack of redundancy (the clip doesn’t exist elsewhere, or not in a readily accessible location)
  • a personal attachment to the details of the clip (I’m particularly attached to this way of structuring that paragraph and don’t want to figure it out again).

The effect is also particularly intense when the destination of the clip is unknown at the time I perform the original copy operation. In those cases, I have not only to remember to paste the clip, but also to figure out how I intend to use it. My conscious cognitive faculties are more heavily “booked,” in other words.

To recap, the intensity (and also the likelihood of occurrence) of the cognitive outsourcing effect seems to correlate independently with these two factors:

  1. an increase in the consequences of losing the clip
  2. an increase in the chance of losing the clip

It is as though my cerebral cortex, in great demand when I’m sitting at my computer doing cognitively intense work, makes use of my sensory cortex, mostly unengaged at those times, for assistance: “Here, sensory center, take this responsibility—We’re too busy.”

This is a sensible system indeed, though its effects can be distractingly intense. Sometimes, when I have failed to paste for several minutes, I often relief myself into a new text document or browser window, and the sensation quickly dissipates.

(I am then left with a separate feeling, a kind of emotional vulnerability associated with having unsaved work open. But that’s fodder for another post.)

Firefox Horizontal Trackpad Scrolling

UPDATE: Smoothwheel’s developer took the time to write a thoughtful comment; please find it below the post.

I’ve spent so, so long trying to figure out how to get horizontal trackpad scrolling working in my installation of Firefox (on a Mac, running 10.3 – 10.5 while the problem persisted). I finally got it, and tracked it down to a problem extension: Smoothwheel.

For me, scrolling horizontally on the trackpad had scrolled the window vertically, for as long as I could remember. All the hints I saw indicated that a slight change to the preferences in about:config would resolve the issue, that the defaults in Firefox were for horizontal scrolling to move forward and backward in the history.

But those hints were from 2005, and I don’t think the forward/backward behavior has been the default for at least a year. So I started looking through my add-ons for potential problems.

The only one I had that should’ve been affecting scrolling behavior was Smoothwheel, which has options for compatibility mode and disabling. Sadly, neither fixed the problem. I tried disabling Smoothwheel at the Firefox level. No dice. Then I tried uninstalling it. Still no fix.

At this point, I thought, it couldn’t be Smoothwheel, so I went back to endless combinations of mousewheel and mousewheel.horizscroll settings in about:config. But nothing helped.

In the end, I took a wild shot and decided to delete [Profile Directory]/chrome/smoothwheel/ entirely to fix the problem. Very strange behavior for an add-on, residing in the chrome folder and not respecting disabling and uninstalling…

Based on the number of problems listed on Smoothwheel’s mozdev page, I can’t imagine I’m the only one having problems here.

Low Battery Alert Using growlnotify

A few days ago, I set out trying to use Growl to let myself know my battery level was getting low.

I was going to write a longer post about my solution, but this morning, somebody posted a hint at macosxhints.com this morning about using the command-line tool growlnotify.

My own setup also relies on growlnotify, so I thought the details of my script would work better as a comment on that hint than as a post on my own site.

Enjoy. There’s also an AppleScript alternative for those who don’t want to use Growl.

NBC + Amazon: No Market Share Worries?

The deal, as I’m sure you’re aware, is that NBC has left Apple for supposedly greener pastures, Amazon’s Unbox video download service. But forgetting about more restrictive DRM, weirder pricing schemes, and the rest, I’m stuck thinking about a few obvious market share sacrifices that NBC must not be aware they’re making.

Here’s one problem: According to Apple’s most recent quarterly report, iTunes Store sales of $608 million represents 33% growth over last year. On the other hand, Amazon’s 10-Q doesn’t mention Unbox, since the service hadn’t even launched as of the report’s late-July release. Even allowing that NBC makes up 40% of video downloads from the iTunes Store, they’re giving up a sizeable existing market in order to try to create their own with Amazon. It’s Slotkin’s old myth of “regeneration through violence” biting them in the ass.

It’s also worth noting that Unbox works only in the US, while iTunes also makes sales around the world. According to the W3Counter, about 30% of Internet traffic comes from the US; depending on one’s calculations, the same portion or greater comes from non-US nations where the iTunes Store makes sales. One has to acknowledge the greater popularity of NBC’s programming in the US than elsewhere, but all the same, here, too, NBC’s move represents a significant sacrifice of the potential market for digital content.

Finally, Unbox currently doesn’t work with any non-Windows OS. Again according to the W3Counter, Apple, Linux, and other systems make up roughly a 6% market share, which is a decent chunk of income to abandon, when you add it to the rest.

Can NBC really hope to make sufficiently greater income, with the switch to Unbox, to outweigh these factors?

[Post prompted by Daring Fireball‘s excellent coverage of the story]